🔗 Share this article

Are your professional networking connections recognizing you as a industry expert? Are hordes of respondents praising your insights on growing your venture? Do recruiters making contact to discuss collaborations?

If not, the reason might be that you're not male.

The Experiment: Changing Gender Identity for Increased Reach

Numerous women joined an organized professional network test recently after viral posts suggested that changing their gender to "male" enhanced their platform visibility.

Other testers modified their professional summaries to incorporate what they called "masculine-oriented" terminology - inserting results-driven business buzzwords like "drive", "revolutionize" and "expedite". Based on reports, their visibility similarly increased.

Algorithmic Bias Concerns Raised

The engagement increase has led some to speculate whether an inherent sexism in the platform's system prioritizes male users who employ professional networking terminology.

Like most major social media platforms, LinkedIn utilizes an algorithm to determine which content are shown to which users - promoting some while suppressing others.

Company Statement

Through a blog post, LinkedIn recognized the trend but claimed it does not factor in "demographic information" when determining post visibility. Instead, the company mentioned that "numerous factors" affect how posts perform.

Changing gender on your profile does not influence how your posts shows up in search or feed.

Personal Experiences

A social media consultant, who changed her gender identifiers to "he/him" and her profile name to "Simon E", reported extraordinary results.

"The statistics I'm observing show a sixteen-fold rise in visitor traffic and a 1,300% increase in impressions," she commented.

Another professional, a marketing expert, began experimenting after noticing her audience decrease substantially.

The Method

• First, she changed her gender to "male"
• Then, she used artificial intelligence to rewrite her profile using "male-coded" wording
• Finally, she recycled previous content with similar "assertive" language

The outcome was immediate: a more than fourfold rise in visibility within seven days.

The Negative Aspect

Despite the success, Cornish voiced unhappiness with the approach.

"Previously, my posts were softer - concise and insightful, but also friendly and human," she stated. "Now, the masculine version was forceful and self-assured - like a Caucasian man being overly confident."

She discontinued the experiment after one week, stating "Each day I persisted, and results improved, I became angrier."

Mixed Results

Not all participants experienced favorable outcomes. One writer who modified both her gender to "man" and her race to "white" described a reduction in visibility and interaction.

"We know there's algorithmic bias, but it's very challenging to comprehend how it operates in particular situations or the reasons behind it," she commented.

Wider Consequences

These tests occur alongside continuing discussions about LinkedIn's unique position as both a professional network and social space.

Recent changes in recent months have apparently caused women professionals experiencing significantly reduced exposure, leading to informal experiments where the same content by male and female users received dramatically unequal audience engagement.

System Details

Per LinkedIn, the platform uses AI systems to categorize and distribute content based on multiple factors, including post content and the user's professional identity.

The company states it frequently assesses its systems, including "examinations of gender-related disparities."

A spokesperson suggested that recent declines in some users' reach might originate from higher volume due to more content on the platform.

Evolving Environment

As one participant noted, "bro-coding" appears to be increasing on the platform.

"People often view LinkedIn as more professional and polished," she remarked. "That's changing. It's becoming increasingly competitive and unpredictable."